Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    UGG boots banned in school. Education crisis solved!

    Uggs: the biggest problem in the American education system?Say what you will about UGG Boots (warm, fuzzy, cruel, unflattering, so 2003, etc.), they're not the biggest problem in education today.

    But a Pennsylvania middle school wants them off students' feet and out of the classroom for good.

    As of Monday, students of Pottstown Middle School will be barred from wearing the fur-lined boots in classes, reports the Delaware County Daily Times.

    This past Wednesday, Pottstown Middle School principal Gail Cooper sent a note home to parents stating "following several problems with these items, I have banned the outdoor, open top boots from our classrooms."


    Those "problems"? Cell phone contraband, hidden in the cozy space between the ankle and boot. School policy states students are allowed to bring their phones to school but they have to be turned off and kept in their lockers during classroom time. All that roomy fur has become the perfect place to smuggle handheld technology into the classroom.

    The new school policy states: "Students may continue to wear outdoor boots to and from school to protect them from cold, snow and ice but need to change into a pair of sneakers or shoes before entering homeroom."

    It's a sad day for people who dress like Chelsea from Teen Mom 2,but a triumph for Goths, '90s revivalists and skaters. Under the new ordinance: "lace up, tight at the ankle, boots, shoes and high top sneakers," are totally acceptable. Expect a few extra members in the middle school Oi! punk appreciation club and the distant "bah" of relief from an Australian baby lamb.

    But parents -- sick of school clothing bans -- aren't nearly as grateful for the new policy. In recent months, schools around the country have outlawed baggy pants, skinny jeans, dyed hair, colorful makeup, short skirts, scoop neck tops and the list goes on. Administrators' focus on student fashion isn't just a confounding approach to serious holes in education, it's becoming a frustrating financial burden for parents.
    "Are you seriously kidding me?" one mom posted on a local paper's Facebook page 

    beneath the reported story . "When the schools started paying to raise and clothe my children then maybe...maybe they can have a say in dictating my child's wardrobe."


    Another parent, among the hundreds commenting on The Mercury's page, called for a student push-back: "I told my kids that they should start a petition. I mean it's bad enough they already wear uniforms and now they want to tell them what shoes they can wear. I could see if it was flip flops, but boots?"

    One parent finds the ban discriminatory towards girls: "I'm assuming this is applying to mostly girls since I rarely see any boys wearing Uggs.... Pockets, bras, socks, what's next?? I think this is absurd!"


    Meanwhile, one pupil makes the most convincing case for reversing the ban: It won't work. "Most girls hide [cell phones] in there bra, or their waist band, it's ineffective they will just keep finding other places," writes the local student. "Plus my phone fits in my sneaker."

    Let's not give schools anymore ideas.


    More from Shine on Yahoo! Canada

    15 fashion regrets

    The wackiest shoes ever

    The top 10 most searched fashion brands of 2011

     
    • Micheal Dasilva  •  Ottawa, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      I'm against the ban. I'm interested in finding why women love this boots so much? Other than the fact that they are comfortable. They are not waterproof and damn are they ugly!
      • Momo 3 months ago
        I'm a girl and I absolutely hate those damn boots. I simply cannot find their "appeal".
      • Rattus 3 months ago
        Yes, they are ugly and not comfortable to walk in, but I bike all year round and shearling is the only thing that keeps my feet warm cycling in -20 weather.
      • chrysler 3 months ago
        i love the sparkly ones , show_girl......
    • GOOLS  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      When...and I mean WHEN my children are old enough to have the responsability of a cell phone, I'll be sure to monitor the activity and if its used during school hours, away it will go. Parenting. Go figure.
      • Sdee 3 months ago
        what is this great "responsibilty of having a cell phone" that you speak of?
        Either you can afford to buy them one or not. I just cannot afford to buy my kids cell phones..and thats the only reason.
      • GOOLS 3 months ago
        my kids will be paying their own bills
      • GOOLS 3 months ago
        by then, they will be responsible enough to have jobs too...
    • just me  •  3 months ago
      well we could neverrrrr wear our ''boots'' in school,,if you didn't have shoes,,then you wore just your socks,,,and anyone who has walked around all day with 'wet' socks on ,,knows it just not nice,lol,,,,besides wearing woolen/fur lined boots all day inside is not good for you anyway, let them breathe, or when you go out , your feet will freeze from the moister ,,of course i do live in canada, where you don't screw with the cold.
      • Josh 3 months ago
        no you could wear boots they just had to be in door only boots
    • KT  •  3 months ago
      Wow, no wonder our kids aren't learning anything! Kids aren't following stated policies, they think it's funny to be sneaky anyway and brag about how they'll just find another way, then just to top things off - the parents complain about how unfair it is! Incredible! No wonder we have an entire generation of self-indulgent, self-righteous, over-indulged, irresponsible brats with a colossal sense of entitlement. Take responsibility for yourselves and your kids, and the schools won't have to dictate policy (or common sense).
      • Wendy 3 months ago
        Well said.
      • Melina 3 months ago
        Here Here!
      • Shelby 3 months ago
        "No wonder we have an entire generation of self-indulgent, self-righteous, over-indulged, irresponsible brats with a colossal sense of entitlement."
        Wow. Thanks. We're not all bad.
    • an old man  •  Greater Sudbury, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Why don't they just buy a cell phone jammer and turn it on inside the school. DUH ????
      Technology does exist !
      • anonymous 3 months ago
        then the parents will say they can't contact them when there's an emergency
      • Economist 3 months ago
        @Anonymous: Ever hear of land lines? Invented by a guy named Bell. Really useful, they are.
      • Janet G. 3 months ago
        Parents would not have a problem with phone jammers during school hours. If they need to reach their child, the office phones work just fine. It is a simple solution that makes sense, but at the same time, it probably costs money. That's why they are not trying it.
    • cathryn  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      This is absolutely ridiculous. As a female high school student, I can tell you that girls get pretty creative when it comes to breaking the rules---bras, backpacks and pockets are all equally discreet hiding spots to sneak a phone in. Instead of banning the boots, the school should get to the root of the problem and make harsher consequences for having phones, not the mechanism of transporting them.
    • Mark  •  Burlington, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      You people are ignoring the real issue here, although you seem to understand it! The real problem is the kids bringing phones to class! This ban will not stop that at all! Deal with the real issue! Start handing out punishments for kids bringing these phones to class, not banning a type of boot which is only going to affect girls, and still leave a million other ways to bring that phone into the class! No wonder the education system is failing, when these are the ideas of those running the school. What a joke!
    • Canadian  •  Fredericton, New Brunswick  •  3 months ago
      If you have ever taught in a classroom while putting up with cell phones it may give you a different opinion. It is a constant struggle and it has a major affect on the quality of learning. If students listened to the rules, these sanctions would not be required.
    • Karce  •  3 months ago
      Cell phone jammers.

      Pure and simple, cell phones are too distracting in class and an opportunity to cheat. If a parent wants to get hold of their kid they can call the office, jammers are the only sure-fire solution but so many people are against them for so many reasons it won't happen but in my opinion they should install them and charge the parents.

      Cell phones and kids don't mix.
    • Bolow  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      I wonder why people are whining over this ban, if the parents closely monitored the kids with cell phones, this would never have been an issue. Would you rather the kids be suspended for bringing cell phones to school? Imagine the volume of distractions their teachers have to go through and how much this impacts the overall learning process and maybe most of us would appreciate that as long as the ban is geared towards them being better students, its welcome. Didnt we all do much better without the cell phone distractions by the way?
    • rb  •  Guelph, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      How about parents paying more attention to what their kids are bringing to school and wearing to school. What 11 year old needs a friggin Iphone for anyway? Parents need to step up so that teachers can stop doing the parents job and focus on teaching these hell cats !
    • Dave  •  Calgary, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      "open top boots" - what the hell does that mean?? aren't all boots open on the top? how else would you get your foot into them?
    • Please don't tickle m ...  •  3 months ago
      It took some time, but I've reached the stage when I see people on phones I am now 100 per cent sure distraction is a meaningless way to waste your life. You don't look cool and connected to me.
    • Momo  •  3 months ago
      One: UGGs are one of the cruelest crimes against fashion.
      Two: No matter what you do, teens are still going to use their cell phones in class. It's sad that when I'm in class, a third of the time that could be spent on the actual lesson is spent with teachers constantly telling my classmates to turn their phones off and/or taking them away.
      That being said, schools can continue banning articles of clothing - it won't solve anything (the only thing it will solve is hideous fashion choices, but that's another matter *ahem* yoga pants...). If kids want to use their cell phones in class, they will. There's nothing that can be done.
      Coming from a teen, I find this extremely frustrating because for some crazy reason, I actually want to learn. I know it sounds incredulous, but I have no interest in texting my friend from across the room. Not only do the people who are texting loose out on their education, but so does everyone else in the damn class!
      I honestly cannot wait until all the in-class texters finally wake up and realize that while they weren't paying attention during class, everyone else graduated and got a job.

      Really, these disrespectful students need to get out of the classes I'm in so I can actually learn in peace. Just go sit in the hallway and text the whole day for all I care.
    • TheMoose  •  3 months ago
      Because they can't just put their phones in their pockets? or do these students get patted down before entering class..
    • Darrel W  •  Kelowna, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      its simple give them a fine if caught with there phones .
    • Caressa  •  Edmonton, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      Bring in the school uniforms...parents can't complain about the expense it will cost them as they'll certainly cut down on clothing costs, and schools and students can focus on academics again instead of fashion. Plus it alleviates distinguishing different classes of students (rich versus poor, as no one will get to wear their $200 name brand jeans anymore while another student wears $20 Walmart jeans). Problem solved.
    • lmusa37  •  Winnipeg, Manitoba  •  3 months ago
      Bloody ridicolous. There were no cell phones in my day or clothing restrictions. Don't kids write notes or shoot spitballs anymore?
    • Beaker  •  Abbotsford, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      bad new for parents who just foolishly spent $150 on a pair of boots for their kid as a Christmas gift
    • nefta m  •  Montreal, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      i can't imagine a scenario in which my school made a rule to reinforce an already existent rule, and my parents protested either of them. these schools need to adopt a 2-strike policy about cellphones. a single warning, and you're expelled the second time. then see how quick the parents would be to tell their kids to put away the cellphones.
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options